Population control ...

For a nation of a billion people , to have reached that number , imagine the effort, that we Indians put in to create so many naked frolicking tiny Indians. And we still can't teach our kids sex?

    They say the cat has nine lives.Coincidence that the human gestation period is nine months? To put the things into perspective our watchman's wife has been pregnant whenever I have seen the poor lady.And from the human sizes rolling all around the floor, it seems; they have been at it for a long time.What bums me out is how and where ? Not to get too crass about it but, we Indians as a collective soul would certainly crack a record for being at it. Indian culture is all about having sex and not having to talk about it. World take heed ! If this phenomenon were ever to made public a lot many disgraced westerners with their post-renaissance intelligentsia would die to take the proverbial nine lives in India.Freud, I think just rolled over in his grave. 
  
   What bums me out about us Indians is; for the extremely large populace so much enjoying sex, how do we let the women be pregnant for lot of the time? This basically limits the time, the dominant male populace can enjoy.If someone can batter the fact into the woolly hare brains of pastoral India, that I guess would be the best contraceptive India can ever think to have. That might seem sadistic on my part to suggest such a gross measure but I guess giving multiple births might not be as good. And I guess if the women weren't pregnant all the time, there would be little lesser collateral damage.( I actually disgusted myself but logic dictates truth !)

  The weirdest thing that comes out it seems India needs to have more sex to create less babies. Logic eh!

Bro’s before Ho’s!

So often has the article one been quoted in the travails of history than I care to think about.If you have any doubts then you can enlighten yourself by reading the Bro’s code.

St. Barnabas Stinson said so and there ain’t a exception to the universal rule.As has been seen so often lately, the article one has been loosely interpreted and thus I think a few clarifications have to be added.

1. At no point in a binge drinking night out can a bro leave another bro in the lurch without a cheers. It is considered to be a cardinal sin to leave a bro waiting destitute.
2. At no point during the above said night out a bro is supposed to talk to the ho for more than the time required to empty half a peg or three gulps of beer. The time in waiting for the other bro’s should be suitable compensated by buying the next two rounds of alcohol.
3. The bro with the ho is not supposed to talk about the emotional disposition of other bro’s to the ho. The only exception to the rule is if the ho is a prospective bro and wingman.
4. A bro is allowed to take the side of the ho in case the ho is present. Under no circumstances is the bro allowed to take the ho’s side in case two or more bro’s disagree on the same (in absentia of the ho duh)!
5. On no account is the bro to sideline a bro’s plan that involves multiple bro’s to just be with the ho. This violates article one in the multiple.
6. In case the bro has to go pink for the ho, he is not to expect another bro to recognize him till the course of the pink interval of life has ended. Understanding emotional patches is not the bro’s job. It is our job to get you drunk and get hooked up. 

PS: the above is meant for the people that are comfortable with the bro's code.In case you find this offending the planet of venus would welcome you for cuddling.